PRO WX 3100 vs GTX 1660 TI - Workstation / Content Creation Benchmark
Topic: AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs nVidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
» View on YouTubeSPECIFICATION | ||
---|---|---|
GPU | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 | nVidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
CPU | Core i9 9980XE | Core i9 9980XE |
Motherboard | ASUS ROG Strix X299-E Gaming | ASUS ROG Strix X299-E Gaming |
RAM | GSkill Flare X 4x8GB DDR4-3200 | GSkill Flare X 4x8GB DDR4-3200 |
Operating System | Windows 10 | Windows 10 |
APPLICATION BENCHMARK | ||
Adobe Premiere Pro CC 2019 RED 8K to 4K – CUDA/OpenCL (GPU Encode Time in Seconds – Lower is Better) | 159 | 42 |
Adobe Premiere Pro CC 2019 YouTube Project Encode Time (AVC) – CUDA/OpenCL (GPU Encode Time in Seconds – Lower is Better) | 473 | 117 |
MAGIX Vegas Pro 16.361 4K Median Playback (Average FPS – Higher is Better) | 1 | 2 |
MAGIX Vegas Pro 16.361 Median FX 4K/60 AVC – NVENC/VCE (Encode Time in Seconds – Lower is Bettter) | 523 | 176 |
Autodesk Arnold Jaguar (Jaguar E-Type Render Time – Lower is Better) | ||
Autodesk Arnold Sophie (Sophie Render Time – Lower is Better) | ||
AMD Radeon Pro Render 2.4.404 Nissan GT-R (Render Time in Seconds – Lower is Better) | 1980 | 357 |
AMD Radeon Pro Render 2.4.404 Villa (Render Time in Seconds – Lower is Better) | 1405 | 149 |
Blender 2.80.51 Viewport 1080p (Average FPS in LookDev – Higher is Better) | 8 | 46 |
Blender 2.80.51 Viewport 4K (Average FPS in LookDev – Higher is Better) | 3 | 18 |
Blender 2.80.51 BMW (Cycles Render Time in Seconds – Lower is Better) | 725 | 97 |
Blender 2.80.51 Classroom (Cycles Render Time in Seconds – Lower is Better) | 803 | 163 |
LuxMark 3.1 Luxball Render Score – Higher is Better | 4164 | 16044 |
LuxMark 3.1 Hotel Render Score – Higher is Better | 661 | 3880 |
Chaos Group V-Ray 4.10.02 Flowers Render Time with 3ds Max 2019 in Seconds – Lower is Better | 174 | |
Chaos Group V-Ray 4.10.02 Teaset Render Time with 3ds Max 2019 in Seconds – Lower is Better | 306 | |
Redshift 2.6.23 Radio Render Time with 3ds Max 2019 in Seconds – Lower is Better | 191 | |
OctaneBench 4.00c (Overall Score – Higher is Better) | 134 | |
OctaneBench 2019 RTX RTX ON (Overall Score – Higher is Better) | ||
OctaneBench 2019 RTX RTX OFF (Overall Score – Higher is Better) | ||
Autodesk 3ds Max (SPECViewPerf 13) 1080p Score (Viewport Performance – Higher is Better) | 46.4 | 161.3 |
Autodesk 3ds Max (SPECViewPerf 13) 4K Score (Viewport Performance – Higher is Better) | 28.5 | 106.4 |
Dassault Systemes CATIA (SPECViewPerf 13) 4K Score (Viewport Performance – Higher is Better) | 28.6 | 49.4 |
Dassault Systemes SolidWorks 4K Score (Viewport Performance – Higher is Better) | 57.9 | 70.3 |
PTC Creo 4K Score (Viewport Performance – Higher is Better) | 34.2 | 99.2 |
Siemens NX 4K Score (Viewport Performance – Higher is Better) | 50.4 | 12.1 |
SiSoftware Sandra 2018 SP4a Cryptography AES256+SHA256 Cryptography Bandwidth (GB/s – Higher is Better) | 11 | 45 |
SiSoftware Sandra 2018 SP4a Financial FP32 Performance (kOPT/s – Higher is Better) | 391 | 2780 |
SiSoftware Sandra 2018 SP4a Scientific FP32 Performance (GFLOPS – Higher is Better) | 196 | 793 |
UL Firestrike 4K Graphics Score – Higher is Better | 936 | 3243 |
UL TimeSpy 4K Graphics Score – Higher is Better | 527 | 2898 |
UL VR Benchmark Blue Room (5120×2880 Resolution) Graphics Score – Higher is Better | 7 | 44 |
» View on YouTube
Topic: AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs nVidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Other benchmark and comparison:
- ARC A770 vs RTX 3080 TI - Gaming Benchmark (1440p)
- RYZEN 5 7600X vs CORE I5 13600K - Productivity & Gaming (RTX 4090)
- RTX 3060 vs GTX 1080 TI - 1080p 1440p Gaming Benchmark (Ryzen 9 3950X)
- RX 7800 XT vs RX 6950 XT - Gaming
- RYZEN 9 3950X vs CORE I7 13700K - Apps & Gaming (RTX 4090)
- RTX 3070 vs RTX 4080 - 13 Games 1440p 4K
- RYZEN 5 7600X vs CORE I9 13900KS - 13 Games & Apps (RTX 4090)
- RTX 2080 vs RTX 3070 - Productivity (i9 13900K)
- CORE I9 11900K vs CORE I5 9400F - Application Benchmark
- RTX 3070 vs RX 5600 XT - Gaming 1080p 1440p 4K (Ryzen 9 5950X)