PRO WX 3100 vs QUADRO P2000 - Workstation / Content Creation Benchmark
Topic: AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs nVidia Quadro P2000
» View on YouTubeSPECIFICATION | ||
---|---|---|
GPU | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 | nVidia Quadro P2000 |
CPU | Core i9 9980XE | Core i9 9980XE |
Motherboard | ASUS ROG Strix X299-E Gaming | ASUS ROG Strix X299-E Gaming |
RAM | GSkill Flare X 4x8GB DDR4-3200 | GSkill Flare X 4x8GB DDR4-3200 |
Operating System | Windows 10 | Windows 10 |
APPLICATION BENCHMARK | ||
Adobe Premiere Pro CC 2019 RED 8K to 4K – CUDA/OpenCL (GPU Encode Time in Seconds – Lower is Better) | 159 | 61 |
Adobe Premiere Pro CC 2019 YouTube Project Encode Time (AVC) – CUDA/OpenCL (GPU Encode Time in Seconds – Lower is Better) | 473 | 154 |
MAGIX Vegas Pro 16.361 4K Median Playback (Average FPS – Higher is Better) | 1 | 1 |
MAGIX Vegas Pro 16.361 Median FX 4K/60 AVC – NVENC/VCE (Encode Time in Seconds – Lower is Bettter) | 523 | 296 |
Autodesk Arnold Jaguar (Jaguar E-Type Render Time – Lower is Better) | 1175 | |
Autodesk Arnold Sophie (Sophie Render Time – Lower is Better) | ||
AMD Radeon Pro Render 2.4.404 Nissan GT-R (Render Time in Seconds – Lower is Better) | 1980 | 691 |
AMD Radeon Pro Render 2.4.404 Villa (Render Time in Seconds – Lower is Better) | 1405 | 395 |
Blender 2.80.51 Viewport 1080p (Average FPS in LookDev – Higher is Better) | 8 | 18 |
Blender 2.80.51 Viewport 4K (Average FPS in LookDev – Higher is Better) | 3 | 7 |
Blender 2.80.51 BMW (Cycles Render Time in Seconds – Lower is Better) | 725 | 204 |
Blender 2.80.51 Classroom (Cycles Render Time in Seconds – Lower is Better) | 803 | 328 |
LuxMark 3.1 Luxball Render Score – Higher is Better | 4164 | 9219 |
LuxMark 3.1 Hotel Render Score – Higher is Better | 661 | 1982 |
Chaos Group V-Ray 4.10.02 Flowers Render Time with 3ds Max 2019 in Seconds – Lower is Better | 347 | |
Chaos Group V-Ray 4.10.02 Teaset Render Time with 3ds Max 2019 in Seconds – Lower is Better | 640 | |
Redshift 2.6.23 Radio Render Time with 3ds Max 2019 in Seconds – Lower is Better | 290 | |
OctaneBench 4.00c (Overall Score – Higher is Better) | 68 | |
OctaneBench 2019 RTX RTX ON (Overall Score – Higher is Better) | ||
OctaneBench 2019 RTX RTX OFF (Overall Score – Higher is Better) | ||
Autodesk 3ds Max (SPECViewPerf 13) 1080p Score (Viewport Performance – Higher is Better) | 46.4 | 109.1 |
Autodesk 3ds Max (SPECViewPerf 13) 4K Score (Viewport Performance – Higher is Better) | 28.5 | 62.3 |
Dassault Systemes CATIA (SPECViewPerf 13) 4K Score (Viewport Performance – Higher is Better) | 28.6 | 72.4 |
Dassault Systemes SolidWorks 4K Score (Viewport Performance – Higher is Better) | 57.9 | 93.1 |
PTC Creo 4K Score (Viewport Performance – Higher is Better) | 34.2 | 71.4 |
Siemens NX 4K Score (Viewport Performance – Higher is Better) | 50.4 | 102.7 |
SiSoftware Sandra 2018 SP4a Cryptography AES256+SHA256 Cryptography Bandwidth (GB/s – Higher is Better) | 11 | 23 |
SiSoftware Sandra 2018 SP4a Financial FP32 Performance (kOPT/s – Higher is Better) | 391 | 978 |
SiSoftware Sandra 2018 SP4a Scientific FP32 Performance (GFLOPS – Higher is Better) | 196 | 414 |
UL Firestrike 4K Graphics Score – Higher is Better | 936 | 2013 |
UL TimeSpy 4K Graphics Score – Higher is Better | 527 | 1340 |
UL VR Benchmark Blue Room (5120×2880 Resolution) Graphics Score – Higher is Better | 7 | 19 |
» View on YouTube
Topic: AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs nVidia Quadro P2000
Other benchmark and comparison:
- RTX 4060 TI 8GB vs RX 6800 XT - Gaming 1440p 4K (R7 7800X3D)
- RX 6800 XT vs RTX 4080 - Gaming 1440p 4K (R7 7800X3D)
- RYZEN 7 7700 vs CORE I5 13600K - Apps & Gaming (RTX 4090)
- CORE I5 11400 vs CORE I5 12600K - Productivity & Gaming (RTX 3080)
- RTX 3050 vs RX 6600 - Gaming Benchmark (1080p & 1440p)
- RTX 3050 vs GTX 1650 - Content Creation & Gaming Benchmark (Ryzen 9 5900X)
- CORE I9 10900K vs CORE I5 9600K - Application Benchmark
- VII vs RTX 2070 SUPER - 1080p 1440p Gaming Benchmark (Ryzen 9 3950X)
- RX 7700 XT vs RX 7800 XT - Gaming
- RTX 3050 vs RX 6650 XT - Gaming Benchmark (1080p & 1440p)