PRO WX 8200 vs VII - Workstation / Content Creation Benchmark
Topic: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs AMD Radeon VII
» View on YouTubeSPECIFICATION | ||
---|---|---|
GPU | AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 | AMD Radeon VII |
CPU | Core i9 9980XE | Core i9 9980XE |
Motherboard | ASUS ROG Strix X299-E Gaming | ASUS ROG Strix X299-E Gaming |
RAM | GSkill Flare X 4x8GB DDR4-3200 | GSkill Flare X 4x8GB DDR4-3200 |
Operating System | Windows 10 | Windows 10 |
APPLICATION BENCHMARK | ||
Adobe Premiere Pro CC 2019 RED 8K to 4K – CUDA/OpenCL (GPU Encode Time in Seconds – Lower is Better) | 36 | 35 |
Adobe Premiere Pro CC 2019 YouTube Project Encode Time (AVC) – CUDA/OpenCL (GPU Encode Time in Seconds – Lower is Better) | 130 | 111 |
MAGIX Vegas Pro 16.361 4K Median Playback (Average FPS – Higher is Better) | 23 | 31 |
MAGIX Vegas Pro 16.361 Median FX 4K/60 AVC – NVENC/VCE (Encode Time in Seconds – Lower is Bettter) | 84 | 69 |
Autodesk Arnold Jaguar (Jaguar E-Type Render Time – Lower is Better) | ||
Autodesk Arnold Sophie (Sophie Render Time – Lower is Better) | ||
AMD Radeon Pro Render 2.4.404 Nissan GT-R (Render Time in Seconds – Lower is Better) | 345 | 218 |
AMD Radeon Pro Render 2.4.404 Villa (Render Time in Seconds – Lower is Better) | 198 | 135 |
Blender 2.80.51 Viewport 1080p (Average FPS in LookDev – Higher is Better) | 42 | 54 |
Blender 2.80.51 Viewport 4K (Average FPS in LookDev – Higher is Better) | 20 | 26 |
Blender 2.80.51 BMW (Cycles Render Time in Seconds – Lower is Better) | 112 | 77 |
Blender 2.80.51 Classroom (Cycles Render Time in Seconds – Lower is Better) | 128 | 88 |
LuxMark 3.1 Luxball Render Score – Higher is Better | 23940 | 51367 |
LuxMark 3.1 Hotel Render Score – Higher is Better | 4538 | 7727 |
Chaos Group V-Ray 4.10.02 Flowers Render Time with 3ds Max 2019 in Seconds – Lower is Better | ||
Chaos Group V-Ray 4.10.02 Teaset Render Time with 3ds Max 2019 in Seconds – Lower is Better | ||
Redshift 2.6.23 Radio Render Time with 3ds Max 2019 in Seconds – Lower is Better | ||
OctaneBench 4.00c (Overall Score – Higher is Better) | ||
OctaneBench 2019 RTX RTX ON (Overall Score – Higher is Better) | ||
OctaneBench 2019 RTX RTX OFF (Overall Score – Higher is Better) | ||
Autodesk 3ds Max (SPECViewPerf 13) 1080p Score (Viewport Performance – Higher is Better) | 152.2 | 161.9 |
Autodesk 3ds Max (SPECViewPerf 13) 4K Score (Viewport Performance – Higher is Better) | 118.8 | 160.5 |
Dassault Systemes CATIA (SPECViewPerf 13) 4K Score (Viewport Performance – Higher is Better) | 114 | 151.4 |
Dassault Systemes SolidWorks 4K Score (Viewport Performance – Higher is Better) | 124.9 | 101.1 |
PTC Creo 4K Score (Viewport Performance – Higher is Better) | 116.1 | 104.3 |
Siemens NX 4K Score (Viewport Performance – Higher is Better) | 176.7 | 44.7 |
SiSoftware Sandra 2018 SP4a Cryptography AES256+SHA256 Cryptography Bandwidth (GB/s – Higher is Better) | 91 | 135 |
SiSoftware Sandra 2018 SP4a Financial FP32 Performance (kOPT/s – Higher is Better) | 2910 | 4620 |
SiSoftware Sandra 2018 SP4a Scientific FP32 Performance (GFLOPS – Higher is Better) | 1150 | 2000 |
UL Firestrike 4K Graphics Score – Higher is Better | 4597 | 6728 |
UL TimeSpy 4K Graphics Score – Higher is Better | 2969 | 4236 |
UL VR Benchmark Blue Room (5120×2880 Resolution) Graphics Score – Higher is Better | 39 | 57 |
» View on YouTube
Topic: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs AMD Radeon VII
Other benchmark and comparison:
- RTX 4080 vs RX 6900 XT - 1440p and 4K Gaming Benchmark
- ARC A770 vs RTX 4080 - Gaming 1080p 1440p 4K RT (i9 13900K)
- RX 6800 vs RTX 4070 - 15 Games 1080p 1440p (R7 7800X3D)
- CORE I9 14900K vs CORE I9 11900K - Apps & Gaming
- GTX 1660 TI vs TITAN XP - Workstation / Content Creation Benchmark
- RX 6700 XT vs RTX 3070 TI - Gaming Benchmark (1080p, 1440p, 4K)
- RX 5700 XT vs RX 6600 XT - Gaming 1080p 1440p 4K (Ryzen 9 5950X)
- RX 6800 XT vs RTX 3060 8GB - 1440p Gaming (Ryzen 7 5800X3D)
- RTX 3090 vs RTX 4080 - Gaming 1440p 4K (Ryzen 7 5800X3D)
- RTX 3060 TI vs RX 5700 XT - 1080p 1440p Gaming Benchmark (Ryzen 9 3950X)