RX 6900 XT vs RTX 3090 TI - Apps & Gaming (Core i9 13900K)
Topic: AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT vs nVidia GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
» View on YouTube| SPECIFICATION | Diff. L/R | Diff. R/L | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPU | AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT | nVidia GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | ||
| CPU | Core i9 13900K | Core i9 13900K | ||
| Motherboard | ASUS ROG Maximus Z790 | ASUS ROG Maximus Z790 | ||
| RAM | 2x16GB DDR5-6800 | 2x16GB DDR5-6800 | ||
| Operating System | Windows 11 21H2 | Windows 11 21H2 | ||
| APPLICATION BENCHMARK | ||||
| Blender 3.4.0 Barber Shop (Render Time in Seconds – Lower is Better) | 119 | 91 | 23.5 % | 30.8 % |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0 Classroom (Samples per minute – Higher is Better) | 644 | 1673 | 61.5 % | 159.8 % |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0 Junk Shop (Samples per minute – Higher is Better) | 734 | 1905 | 61.5 % | 159.5 % |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0 Monster (Samples per minute – Higher is Better) | 1337 | 2964 | 54.9 % | 121.7 % |
| UL Procyon – Photo Editing Adobe Photoshop (Score – Higher is Better) | 10682 | 11933 | 10.5 % | 11.7 % |
| UL Procyon – Video Editing Adobe Premiere (Score – Higher is Better) | 6542 | 9790 | 33.2 % | 49.6 % |
| DaVinci Resolve H264 Timeline Export (Render Time in Seconds – Lower is Better) | 428 | 281 | 34.3 % | 52.3 % |
| SPECviewperf 2020 – Energy (Score – Higher is Better) | 45 | 32 | 40.6 % | 28.9 % |
| SPECviewperf 2020 – Creo (Score – Higher is Better) | 147 | 121 | 21.5 % | 17.7 % |
| SPECviewperf 2020 – 3DS Max (Score – Higher is Better) | 86 | 155 | 44.5 % | 80.2 % |
| SPECviewperf 2020 – Solidworks (Score – Higher is Better) | 188 | 213 | 11.7 % | 13.3 % |
| SPECviewperf 2020 – Medical (Score – Higher is Better) | 47 | 25 | 88.0 % | 46.8 % |
| SPECviewperf 2020 – CATIA (Score – Higher is Better) | 101 | 67 | 50.7 % | 33.7 % |
| SPECviewperf 2020 – Siemens NX (Score – Higher is Better) | 441 | 28 | 1,475.0 % | 93.7 % |
| SPECviewperf 2020 – Maya (Score – Higher is Better) | 367 | 378 | 2.9 % | 3.0 % |
| SPECworkstation 3.1 – Life Sciences (Score – Higher is Better) | 11 | 8 | 37.5 % | 27.3 % |
| SPECworkstation 3.1 – Product Dev (Score – Higher is Better) | 5 | 2 | 150.0 % | 60.0 % |
| SPECworkstation 3.1 – Media & Ent. (Score – Higher is Better) | 7 | 7 | 0.0 % | 0.0 % |
| SPECworkstation 3.1 – Energy (Score – Higher is Better) | 18 | 10 | 80.0 % | 44.4 % |
| SPECworkstation 3.1 – GPU Compute (Score – Higher is Better) | 6 | 6 | 0.0 % | 0.0 % |
| GAMING BENCHMARK | ||||
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4K, Highest Preset, RT OFF, Scaling OFF (Average FPS – Higher is Better) | 92 | 113 | 18.6 % | 22.8 % |
| F1 22 4K, Ultra High Preset, Canada(Wet), RT OFF, Scaling OFF (Average FPS – Higher is Better) | 145 | 148 | 2.0 % | 2.1 % |
| Hitman 3 4K, Ultra Setting – Dubai, Scaling OFF (Average FPS – Higher is Better) | 127 | 135 | 5.9 % | 6.3 % |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 4K, Ultra Preset, Scaling OFF (Average FPS – Higher is Better) | 72 | 89 | 19.1 % | 23.6 % |
| Assassin’s Creed: Valhalla 4K, Ultra Preset, Scaling OFF (Average FPS – Higher is Better) | 73 | 83 | 12.0 % | 13.7 % |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 4K, Ultra Preset, Scaling OFF (Average FPS – Higher is Better) | 77 | 79 | 2.5 % | 2.6 % |
| Cyberpunk 2077 4K, Ultra Preset, RT OFF, Scaling OFF (Average FPS – Higher is Better) | 44 | 63 | 30.2 % | 43.2 % |
| Forza Horizon 5 4K, Ultra Preset, RT OFF, Scaling OFF (Average FPS – Higher is Better) | 97 | 97 | 0.0 % | 0.0 % |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p, Highest Preset, RT OFF, Scaling OFF (Average FPS – Higher is Better) | 174 | 196 | 11.2 % | 12.6 % |
| Hitman 3 1440p, Highest Preset – Dubai, Scaling OFF (Average FPS – Higher is Better) | 220 | 237 | 7.2 % | 7.7 % |
| Cyberpunk 2077 1440p, Ultra Preset, RT OFF, Scaling OFF (Average FPS – Higher is Better) | 96 | 115 | 16.5 % | 19.8 % |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 1440p, Ultra Preset, Scaling OFF (Average FPS – Higher is Better) | 126 | 127 | 0.8 % | 0.8 % |
| Assassin’s Creed: Valhalla 1440p, Ultra Preset, Scaling OFF (Average FPS – Higher is Better) | 124 | 125 | 0.8 % | 0.8 % |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 1440p, Ultra Preset, Scaling OFF (Average FPS – Higher is Better) | 112 | 127 | 11.8 % | 13.4 % |
| Forza Horizon 5 1440p, Ultra Preset, RT OFF, Scaling OFF (Average FPS – Higher is Better) | 136 | 132 | 3.0 % | 2.9 % |
| Average FPS (Higher is Better) | 114.33 | 124.4 | 8.1 % | 8.8 % |
» View on YouTube
Topic: AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT vs nVidia GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
Other benchmark and comparison:
- CORE I5 4690K vs RYZEN 7 1700 - Productivity & Gaming (RTX 2080 Ti)
- RTX 3060 vs RX 6700 XT - 1080p 1440p Gaming Benchmark (Ryzen 9 3950X)
- RX 7900 XT vs RTX 4070 TI - Gaming 1440p 4K (Ryzen 7 5800X3D)
- QUADRO P4000 vs RTX 2060 - Workstation / Content Creation Benchmark
- RX 6800 vs RTX 3060 8GB - Gaming 1080p & 1440p (Ryzen 7 5800X3D)
- CORE I5 13600K vs RYZEN 7 3700X
- RTX 3060 vs RX VEGA 56 - Gaming 1080p 1440p 4K (Ryzen 9 5950X)
- RYZEN 5 3600 vs RYZEN 7 7700X - Productivity & Gaming (RTX 4090)
- RX 6900 XT vs RTX 2070 - Gaming 1080P 1440P (Ryzen 9 3950X)
- RYZEN 7 5800X3D vs CORE I5 13600K - Productivity & Gaming (RTX 4090)