
CORE I5 10600K vs RYZEN 9 3900X - Apps & Gaming (RTX 3090)
Topic: Intel Core i5 10600K vs AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
» View on YouTubeSPECIFICATION | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
CPU | Intel Core i5 10600K | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X | ||
GPU | RTX 3090 | RTX 3090 | ||
Chipset | Highend | Highend | ||
Setting | Stock | Stock | ||
CPU Cooler | AIO 360 Liquid Cooler | AIO 360 Liquid Cooler | ||
APPLICATION BENCHMARK | ||||
Cinebench R20 Multi Core Score – Higher is Better | 3601 | - 50.2 % | 7235 | + 100.9 % |
Cinebench R20 Single Core Score – Higher is Better | 483 | - 6.8 % | 518 | + 7.2 % |
SiSoft Sandra Cryptography AES-256 Multi-Threaded Performance GB/s – Higher is Better | 13 | - 48.0 % | 25 | + 92.3 % |
Blender Open Data BMW Render Time in Seconds – Lower is Better | 1282 | - 49.7 % | 645 | + 98.8 % |
V-Ray Benchmark v 4.10 ksamples – Higher is Better | 10366 | - 48.4 % | 20102 | + 93.9 % |
Corona 1.3 Benchmark Render Time Lower is Better | 136 | - 47.8 % | 71 | + 91.5 % |
DaVinci Resolve Studio 16 4K – Puget Systems Benchmark Score – Higher is Better | 909 | - 22.5 % | 1173 | + 29.0 % |
Adobe Premiere Pro 2020 Standard Media – Puget Systems Benchmark Score – Higher is Better | 636 | - 30.8 % | 919 | + 44.5 % |
Adobe Photoshop 2020 Puget Systems Benchmark Score – Higher is Better | 908 | - 6.6 % | 972 | + 7.0 % |
Adobe After Effects 2020 4K – Puget Systems Benchmark Score – Higher is Better | 988 | - 10.0 % | 1098 | + 11.1 % |
Chromium Compile clang-cl, Ninja Build Time in Seconds – Lower is Better | 8244 | - 49.1 % | 4200 | + 96.3 % |
7-Zip File Manager Compression MIPS – Higher is Better | 55796 | - 43.6 % | 98930 | + 77.3 % |
7-Zip File Manager Decompression MIPS – Higher is Better | 61628 | - 56.0 % | 140214 | + 127.5 % |
Total Power Consumption Blender Watts – Lower is Better | 198 | + 16.7 % | 231 | - 14.3 % |
GAMING BENCHMARK | ||||
Far Cry New Dawn [DX11] 1080p, Ultra Quality, TAA Average FPS – Higher is Better | 121 | + 5.2 % | 115 | - 5.0 % |
Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege [Vulkan] 1080p, Ultra Quality, 100% Render Scale Average FPS – Higher is Better | 454 | - 3.4 % | 470 | + 3.5 % |
Watch Dogs: Legion 1080p, Ultra Quality Average FPS – Higher is Better | 109 | + 9.0 % | 100 | - 8.3 % |
F1 2020 [DX12] 1080p, Ultra High Quality, TAA Average FPS – Higher is Better | 247 | + 9.8 % | 225 | - 8.9 % |
Horizon Zero Dawn 1080p, Ultimate Quality Average FPS – Higher is Better | 153 | + 6.3 % | 144 | - 5.9 % |
Borderlands 3 [DX12] 1080p, Ultra Quality Average FPS – Higher is Better | 162 | + 5.9 % | 153 | - 5.6 % |
Dead Stranding 1080p, Very High Quality, TAA Average FPS – Higher is Better | 168 | + 1.8 % | 165 | - 1.8 % |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p, Ultra Quality Average FPS – Higher is Better | 133 | - 2.2 % | 136 | + 2.3 % |
Hitman 2 1080p, Ultra Quality Average FPS – Higher is Better | 130 | + 6.6 % | 122 | - 6.2 % |
Star Wars: Squadrons 1080p, Ultra Quality Average FPS – Higher is Better | 259 | + 4.9 % | 247 | - 4.6 % |
Serious Sam 4 [Vulkan] 1080p, Ultra Quality Average FPS – Higher is Better | 91 | + 4.6 % | 87 | - 4.4 % |
1080p Average FPS Higher is Better | 184.27 | + 3.2 % | 178.55 | - 3.1 % |
» View on YouTube
Topic: Intel Core i5 10600K vs AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Other benchmark and comparison:
- GTX 1070 vs RTX 2080 SUPER - 1080p 1440p Gaming Benchmark (Ryzen 9 3950X)
- RX 5600 XT vs GTX 1650 - Gaming 1440P (Ryzen 9 5950X)
- RTX 4070 vs RX 6950 XT - Gaming 1440p 4K (R7 7800X3D)
- CORE I5 10400 vs RYZEN 5 1600 - Apps, Content Creation & Gaming Benchmark
- ATHLON 3000G vs A12 9800 - Application Benchmark
- GTX 1650 vs RX 6500 XT - 1080p Gaming Benchmark
- RYZEN 7 3700X vs THREADRIPPER 1920X - Productivity & Gaming (RTX 2080 Ti)
- RYZEN 7 1700 vs CORE I5 13400F - Gaming & Productivity (RTX 3090 Ti)
- RYZEN 7 5800X3D vs RYZEN 7 7700X - Apps & Gaming (RTX 4090)
- RTX 3060 TI vs GTX 980 TI - Gaming 1080P 1440P (Ryzen 9 3950X)