CORE I5 14600K vs CORE I9 14900K - Apps & Gaming (2026)
Topic: Intel Core i5 14600K vs Intel Core i9 14900K
» View on YouTube| SPECIFICATION | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPU | Intel Core i5 14600K | Intel Core i9 14900K | ||
| Motherboard | MSI Z790 Carbon | MSI Z790 Carbon | ||
| RAM | 32GB DDR5-6000 | 32GB DDR5-6000 | ||
| GPU | RTX 5090 | RTX 5090 | ||
| Operating System | Windows 11 | Windows 11 | ||
| Setting | Stock, Default | Stock, Default | ||
| APPLICATION BENCHMARK | ||||
| Cinebench 2024 Multi Core (Higher is Better) | 1404 | 2209 | ||
| Cinebench 2024 Single Core (Higher is Better) | 122 | 133 | ||
| 7-Zip Compression GIPS (Higher is Better) | 139 | 202 | ||
| 7-Zip Decompression GIPS (Higher is Better) | 137 | 226 | ||
| Power Consumption Cinebench 2024 (Watts – Lower is Better) | 212 | 309 | ||
| Efficiency: Score / Watt Cinebench 2024 (Higher is Better) | 6.62 | 7.15 | ||
| GAMING BENCHMARK | ||||
| The Last of Us Part II 1080p, Very High (Average FPS – Higher is Better) | 180 | 209 | ||
| (1% Low FPS – Higher is Better) | 134 | 155 | ||
| Rainbow Six Siege X 1080p, Ultra (Average FPS – Higher is Better) | 401 | 505 | ||
| (1% Low FPS – Higher is Better) | 347 | 397 | ||
| Battlefield 6 1080p, Overkill (Average FPS – Higher is Better) | 170 | 177 | ||
| (1% Low FPS – Higher is Better) | 125 | 128 | ||
| ARC Raiders 1080p, Epic RT (Average FPS – Higher is Better) | 167 | 204 | ||
| (1% Low FPS – Higher is Better) | 117 | 143 | ||
| Borderlands 4 1080p, Badass (Average FPS – Higher is Better) | 101 | 105 | ||
| (1% Low FPS – Higher is Better) | 78 | 86 | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty 1080p, Medium (Average FPS – Higher is Better) | 156 | 190 | ||
| (1% Low FPS – Higher is Better) | 116 | 144 | ||
| Spider-Man 2 1080p, Ultimate RT (Average FPS – Higher is Better) | 93 | 115 | ||
| (1% Low FPS – Higher is Better) | 77 | 93 | ||
| Counter Strike 2 1080p, Very High (Average FPS – Higher is Better) | 316 | 389 | ||
| (1% Low FPS – Higher is Better) | 192 | 224 | ||
| Average FPS 1080p, Avg. FPS (Higher is Better) | 198 | 236.75 | ||
| Average FPS 1080p, 1% Low FPS (Higher is Better) | 148.25 | 171.25 | ||
| FPS Consistency 1% Low / Avg. FPS (% – Higher is Better) | 74.87 | 72.33 | ||
| Power Consumption Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty 1080p (Watts – Lower is Better) | 140 | 214 | ||
| Efficiency: Watts / FPS Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty 1080p (Watts – Lower is Better) | .9 | 1.13 | ||
» View on YouTube
Topic: Intel Core i5 14600K vs Intel Core i9 14900K
Other benchmark and comparison:
- CORE I7 13700K vs CORE I5 13600K - Apps & Gaming 1080p 1440p (RTX 4090)
- RTX 4090 vs RX 7900 XT - Productivity & Gaming (Core i9 13900K)
- CORE I9 10900K vs RYZEN 5 5600X - Apps & Gaming (RTX 3080)
- RTX 3050 vs GTX 1660 SUPER - Gaming & Rendering (Ryzen 9 5900X)
- RTX 4060 TI 16GB vs RTX 4080 - Gaming 1440p 4K (R7 7800X3D)
- RYZEN 7 2700X vs CORE I5 9600K - Apps, Content Creation & Gaming Benchmark
- RYZEN 5 7600X vs RYZEN 7 7700 - Apps & Gaming (RTX 4090)
- RTX 3060 vs RTX 3070 TI - Gaming Benchmark (1080p & 1440p)
- RTX 3070 TI vs RTX 4080 - Productivity & Gaming (Core i9 13900K)
- RTX 2070 vs RX 6800 XT - 1080p 1440p Gaming Benchmark (Ryzen 9 3950X)