CORE ULTRA 9 285K vs CORE I5 14600K - Apps & Gaming (2026)
Topic: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Core i5 14600K
» View on YouTube| SPECIFICATION | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPU | Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Intel Core i5 14600K | ||
| Motherboard | ASUS ROG Z890 | MSI Z790 Carbon | ||
| RAM | 32GB DDR5-6000 | 32GB DDR5-6000 | ||
| GPU | RTX 5090 | RTX 5090 | ||
| Operating System | Windows 11 | Windows 11 | ||
| Setting | Stock, Default | Stock, Default | ||
| APPLICATION BENCHMARK | ||||
| Cinebench 2024 Multi Core (Higher is Better) | 2523 | 1404 | ||
| Cinebench 2024 Single Core (Higher is Better) | 150 | 122 | ||
| 7-Zip Compression GIPS (Higher is Better) | 203 | 139 | ||
| 7-Zip Decompression GIPS (Higher is Better) | 212 | 137 | ||
| Power Consumption Cinebench 2024 (Watts – Lower is Better) | 258 | 212 | ||
| Efficiency: Score / Watt Cinebench 2024 (Higher is Better) | 9.78 | 6.62 | ||
| GAMING BENCHMARK | ||||
| The Last of Us Part II 1080p, Very High (Average FPS – Higher is Better) | 181 | 180 | ||
| (1% Low FPS – Higher is Better) | 146 | 134 | ||
| Rainbow Six Siege X 1080p, Ultra (Average FPS – Higher is Better) | 460 | 401 | ||
| (1% Low FPS – Higher is Better) | 378 | 347 | ||
| Battlefield 6 1080p, Overkill (Average FPS – Higher is Better) | 174 | 170 | ||
| (1% Low FPS – Higher is Better) | 127 | 125 | ||
| ARC Raiders 1080p, Epic RT (Average FPS – Higher is Better) | 195 | 167 | ||
| (1% Low FPS – Higher is Better) | 125 | 117 | ||
| Borderlands 4 1080p, Badass (Average FPS – Higher is Better) | 104 | 101 | ||
| (1% Low FPS – Higher is Better) | 82 | 78 | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty 1080p, Medium (Average FPS – Higher is Better) | 165 | 156 | ||
| (1% Low FPS – Higher is Better) | 122 | 116 | ||
| Spider-Man 2 1080p, Ultimate RT (Average FPS – Higher is Better) | 98 | 93 | ||
| (1% Low FPS – Higher is Better) | 76 | 77 | ||
| Counter Strike 2 1080p, Very High (Average FPS – Higher is Better) | 352 | 316 | ||
| (1% Low FPS – Higher is Better) | 211 | 192 | ||
| Average FPS 1080p, Avg. FPS (Higher is Better) | 216.13 | 198 | ||
| Average FPS 1080p, 1% Low FPS (Higher is Better) | 158.38 | 148.25 | ||
| FPS Consistency 1% Low / Avg. FPS (% – Higher is Better) | 73.28 | 74.87 | ||
| Power Consumption Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty 1080p (Watts – Lower is Better) | 145 | 140 | ||
| Efficiency: Watts / FPS Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty 1080p (Watts – Lower is Better) | .88 | .9 | ||
» View on YouTube
Topic: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Core i5 14600K
Other benchmark and comparison:
- GTX 1080 vs ARC A770 - Productivity (i9 13900K)
- RX 6800 vs RX 5700 XT - Gaming 1080P 1440P (Ryzen 9 3950X)
- CORE I9 14900K vs RYZEN 5 7600X - Apps & Gaming
- RX 590 vs QUADRO P4000 - Workstation / Content Creation Benchmark
- CORE I5 12400 vs RYZEN 7 5800X3D - Gaming & Productivity (RTX 3090 Ti)
- RYZEN 5 2600 vs RYZEN 7 3700X - Gaming & Productivity (RTX 3090 Ti)
- RX 6400 vs RTX 3050 - 1080p Gaming Benchmark
- RYZEN 9 9950X3D vs CORE ULTRA 9 285K - Apps & Gaming
- CORE I7 10700K vs CORE I9 10900K - Apps & Gaming Benchmark (RTX 3090)
- RX VEGA 56 vs RX 6700 XT - Gaming Benchmark (1080p, 1440p, 4K)