CORE ULTRA 9 285K vs CORE I9 14900K - Apps & Gaming (2026)
Topic: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Core i9 14900K
» View on YouTube| SPECIFICATION | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPU | Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | Intel Core i9 14900K | ||
| Motherboard | ASUS ROG Z890 | MSI Z790 Carbon | ||
| RAM | 32GB DDR5-6000 | 32GB DDR5-6000 | ||
| GPU | RTX 5090 | RTX 5090 | ||
| Operating System | Windows 11 | Windows 11 | ||
| Setting | Stock, Default | Stock, Default | ||
| APPLICATION BENCHMARK | ||||
| Cinebench 2024 Multi Core (Higher is Better) | 2523 | 2209 | ||
| Cinebench 2024 Single Core (Higher is Better) | 150 | 133 | ||
| 7-Zip Compression GIPS (Higher is Better) | 203 | 202 | ||
| 7-Zip Decompression GIPS (Higher is Better) | 212 | 226 | ||
| Power Consumption Cinebench 2024 (Watts – Lower is Better) | 258 | 309 | ||
| Efficiency: Score / Watt Cinebench 2024 (Higher is Better) | 9.78 | 7.15 | ||
| GAMING BENCHMARK | ||||
| The Last of Us Part II 1080p, Very High (Average FPS – Higher is Better) | 181 | 209 | ||
| (1% Low FPS – Higher is Better) | 146 | 155 | ||
| Rainbow Six Siege X 1080p, Ultra (Average FPS – Higher is Better) | 460 | 505 | ||
| (1% Low FPS – Higher is Better) | 378 | 397 | ||
| Battlefield 6 1080p, Overkill (Average FPS – Higher is Better) | 174 | 177 | ||
| (1% Low FPS – Higher is Better) | 127 | 128 | ||
| ARC Raiders 1080p, Epic RT (Average FPS – Higher is Better) | 195 | 204 | ||
| (1% Low FPS – Higher is Better) | 125 | 143 | ||
| Borderlands 4 1080p, Badass (Average FPS – Higher is Better) | 104 | 105 | ||
| (1% Low FPS – Higher is Better) | 82 | 86 | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty 1080p, Medium (Average FPS – Higher is Better) | 165 | 190 | ||
| (1% Low FPS – Higher is Better) | 122 | 144 | ||
| Spider-Man 2 1080p, Ultimate RT (Average FPS – Higher is Better) | 98 | 115 | ||
| (1% Low FPS – Higher is Better) | 76 | 93 | ||
| Counter Strike 2 1080p, Very High (Average FPS – Higher is Better) | 352 | 389 | ||
| (1% Low FPS – Higher is Better) | 211 | 224 | ||
| Average FPS 1080p, Avg. FPS (Higher is Better) | 216.13 | 236.75 | ||
| Average FPS 1080p, 1% Low FPS (Higher is Better) | 158.38 | 171.25 | ||
| FPS Consistency 1% Low / Avg. FPS (% – Higher is Better) | 73.28 | 72.33 | ||
| Power Consumption Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty 1080p (Watts – Lower is Better) | 145 | 214 | ||
| Efficiency: Watts / FPS Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty 1080p (Watts – Lower is Better) | .88 | 1.13 | ||
» View on YouTube
Topic: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Core i9 14900K
Other benchmark and comparison:
- RYZEN 9 7900X vs RYZEN 9 7900X3D - Productivity & Gaming (RTX 4090)
- RTX 3070 vs RX 6900 XT - Gaming 1440p 4K (Ryzen 7 5800X3D)
- RX 6700 XT vs RTX A4000 - Gaming 1080p 1440p 4K (Ryzen 9 5950X)
- CORE ULTRA 5 245K vs RYZEN 9 7900 - Apps & Games
- RX 7900 XTX vs RTX 4090 - Gaming 1080p 1440p 4K RT (i7 12700KF)
- RTX 3050 vs RX 570 (4GB) - Gaming 1440P (Ryzen 9 5950X)
- QUADRO P4000 vs TITAN XP - Workstation / Content Creation Benchmark
- RTX 4070 TI vs RX 6900 XT - Productivity & Gaming (Core i9 13900K)
- CORE I5 6600K vs RYZEN 9 3950X - Productivity & Gaming (RTX 2080 Ti)
- RX 6650 XT vs RTX 3060 TI - 15 Games 1080p 1440p (R7 7800X3D)