HWBen

GTX 1660 TI vs PRO WX 8200 - Workstation / Content Creation Benchmark

Topic: nVidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

» View on YouTube
SPECIFICATION
GPUnVidia GeForce GTX 1660 TiAMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
CPUCore i9 9980XECore i9 9980XE
MotherboardASUS ROG Strix X299-E GamingASUS ROG Strix X299-E Gaming
RAMGSkill Flare X 4x8GB DDR4-3200GSkill Flare X 4x8GB DDR4-3200
Operating SystemWindows 10Windows 10
APPLICATION BENCHMARK
Adobe Premiere Pro CC 2019
RED 8K to 4K – CUDA/OpenCL
(GPU Encode Time in Seconds – Lower is Better)
4236
Adobe Premiere Pro CC 2019
YouTube Project Encode Time (AVC) – CUDA/OpenCL
(GPU Encode Time in Seconds – Lower is Better)
117130
MAGIX Vegas Pro 16.361
4K Median Playback
(Average FPS – Higher is Better)
223
MAGIX Vegas Pro 16.361
Median FX 4K/60 AVC – NVENC/VCE
(Encode Time in Seconds – Lower is Bettter)
17684
Autodesk
Arnold Jaguar
(Jaguar E-Type Render Time – Lower is Better)
Autodesk
Arnold Sophie
(Sophie Render Time – Lower is Better)
AMD Radeon Pro Render 2.4.404
Nissan GT-R
(Render Time in Seconds – Lower is Better)
357345
AMD Radeon Pro Render 2.4.404
Villa
(Render Time in Seconds – Lower is Better)
149198
Blender 2.80.51
Viewport 1080p
(Average FPS in LookDev – Higher is Better)
4642
Blender 2.80.51
Viewport 4K
(Average FPS in LookDev – Higher is Better)
1820
Blender 2.80.51
BMW
(Cycles Render Time in Seconds – Lower is Better)
97112
Blender 2.80.51
Classroom
(Cycles Render Time in Seconds – Lower is Better)
163128
LuxMark 3.1
Luxball Render Score – Higher is Better
1604423940
LuxMark 3.1
Hotel Render Score – Higher is Better
38804538
Chaos Group V-Ray 4.10.02
Flowers
Render Time with 3ds Max 2019 in Seconds – Lower is Better
174
Chaos Group V-Ray 4.10.02
Teaset
Render Time with 3ds Max 2019 in Seconds – Lower is Better
306
Redshift 2.6.23
Radio
Render Time with 3ds Max 2019 in Seconds – Lower is Better
191
OctaneBench 4.00c
(Overall Score – Higher is Better)
134
OctaneBench 2019 RTX
RTX ON
(Overall Score – Higher is Better)
OctaneBench 2019 RTX
RTX OFF
(Overall Score – Higher is Better)
Autodesk 3ds Max (SPECViewPerf 13)
1080p Score
(Viewport Performance – Higher is Better)
161.3152.2
Autodesk 3ds Max (SPECViewPerf 13)
4K Score
(Viewport Performance – Higher is Better)
106.4118.8
Dassault Systemes CATIA (SPECViewPerf 13)
4K Score
(Viewport Performance – Higher is Better)
49.4114
Dassault Systemes SolidWorks
4K Score
(Viewport Performance – Higher is Better)
70.3124.9
PTC Creo
4K Score
(Viewport Performance – Higher is Better)
99.2116.1
Siemens NX
4K Score
(Viewport Performance – Higher is Better)
12.1176.7
SiSoftware Sandra 2018 SP4a Cryptography
AES256+SHA256 Cryptography Bandwidth
(GB/s – Higher is Better)
4591
SiSoftware Sandra 2018 SP4a Financial
FP32 Performance
(kOPT/s – Higher is Better)
27802910
SiSoftware Sandra 2018 SP4a Scientific
FP32 Performance
(GFLOPS – Higher is Better)
7931150
UL Firestrike 4K
Graphics Score – Higher is Better
32434597
UL TimeSpy 4K
Graphics Score – Higher is Better
28982969
UL VR Benchmark
Blue Room (5120×2880 Resolution)
Graphics Score – Higher is Better
4439

» View on YouTube

Topic: nVidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Other benchmark and comparison:

Trending

Loading...