GTX 1660 TI vs QUADRO P4000 - Workstation / Content Creation Benchmark
Topic: nVidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs nVidia Quadro P4000
» View on YouTubeSPECIFICATION | ||
---|---|---|
GPU | nVidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | nVidia Quadro P4000 |
CPU | Core i9 9980XE | Core i9 9980XE |
Motherboard | ASUS ROG Strix X299-E Gaming | ASUS ROG Strix X299-E Gaming |
RAM | GSkill Flare X 4x8GB DDR4-3200 | GSkill Flare X 4x8GB DDR4-3200 |
Operating System | Windows 10 | Windows 10 |
APPLICATION BENCHMARK | ||
Adobe Premiere Pro CC 2019 RED 8K to 4K – CUDA/OpenCL (GPU Encode Time in Seconds – Lower is Better) | 42 | 39 |
Adobe Premiere Pro CC 2019 YouTube Project Encode Time (AVC) – CUDA/OpenCL (GPU Encode Time in Seconds – Lower is Better) | 117 | 176 |
MAGIX Vegas Pro 16.361 4K Median Playback (Average FPS – Higher is Better) | 2 | 2 |
MAGIX Vegas Pro 16.361 Median FX 4K/60 AVC – NVENC/VCE (Encode Time in Seconds – Lower is Bettter) | 176 | 186 |
Autodesk Arnold Jaguar (Jaguar E-Type Render Time – Lower is Better) | 406 | |
Autodesk Arnold Sophie (Sophie Render Time – Lower is Better) | ||
AMD Radeon Pro Render 2.4.404 Nissan GT-R (Render Time in Seconds – Lower is Better) | 357 | 364 |
AMD Radeon Pro Render 2.4.404 Villa (Render Time in Seconds – Lower is Better) | 149 | 235 |
Blender 2.80.51 Viewport 1080p (Average FPS in LookDev – Higher is Better) | 46 | 30 |
Blender 2.80.51 Viewport 4K (Average FPS in LookDev – Higher is Better) | 18 | 12 |
Blender 2.80.51 BMW (Cycles Render Time in Seconds – Lower is Better) | 97 | 127 |
Blender 2.80.51 Classroom (Cycles Render Time in Seconds – Lower is Better) | 163 | 211 |
LuxMark 3.1 Luxball Render Score – Higher is Better | 16044 | 15436 |
LuxMark 3.1 Hotel Render Score – Higher is Better | 3880 | 3343 |
Chaos Group V-Ray 4.10.02 Flowers Render Time with 3ds Max 2019 in Seconds – Lower is Better | 174 | 210 |
Chaos Group V-Ray 4.10.02 Teaset Render Time with 3ds Max 2019 in Seconds – Lower is Better | 306 | 427 |
Redshift 2.6.23 Radio Render Time with 3ds Max 2019 in Seconds – Lower is Better | 191 | 204 |
OctaneBench 4.00c (Overall Score – Higher is Better) | 134 | 115 |
OctaneBench 2019 RTX RTX ON (Overall Score – Higher is Better) | ||
OctaneBench 2019 RTX RTX OFF (Overall Score – Higher is Better) | ||
Autodesk 3ds Max (SPECViewPerf 13) 1080p Score (Viewport Performance – Higher is Better) | 161.3 | 154.8 |
Autodesk 3ds Max (SPECViewPerf 13) 4K Score (Viewport Performance – Higher is Better) | 106.4 | 97.7 |
Dassault Systemes CATIA (SPECViewPerf 13) 4K Score (Viewport Performance – Higher is Better) | 49.4 | 117.3 |
Dassault Systemes SolidWorks 4K Score (Viewport Performance – Higher is Better) | 70.3 | 117 |
PTC Creo 4K Score (Viewport Performance – Higher is Better) | 99.2 | 110 |
Siemens NX 4K Score (Viewport Performance – Higher is Better) | 12.1 | 161.5 |
SiSoftware Sandra 2018 SP4a Cryptography AES256+SHA256 Cryptography Bandwidth (GB/s – Higher is Better) | 45 | 36 |
SiSoftware Sandra 2018 SP4a Financial FP32 Performance (kOPT/s – Higher is Better) | 2780 | 1580 |
SiSoftware Sandra 2018 SP4a Scientific FP32 Performance (GFLOPS – Higher is Better) | 793 | 643 |
UL Firestrike 4K Graphics Score – Higher is Better | 3243 | 3462 |
UL TimeSpy 4K Graphics Score – Higher is Better | 2898 | 2263 |
UL VR Benchmark Blue Room (5120×2880 Resolution) Graphics Score – Higher is Better | 44 | 32 |
» View on YouTube
Topic: nVidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs nVidia Quadro P4000
Other benchmark and comparison:
- CORE I5 13600K vs RYZEN 9 5950X
- RYZEN 7 5800X vs CORE I3 12100F - Productivity & Gaming (RTX 3080)
- GTX 1080 TI vs RTX 2070 - Gaming 1080P 1440P (Ryzen 9 3950X)
- RX 7700 XT vs RX 6800 - Gaming
- RYZEN 5 7600X vs CORE I9 12900K - Apps & Gaming (RTX 4090)
- RTX 2060 vs RX 6900 XT - 1080p 1440p Gaming Benchmark (Ryzen 9 3950X)
- RX 6800 vs RTX 2070 - Gaming 1080P 1440P (Ryzen 9 3950X)
- RYZEN 5 7600X vs RYZEN 7 5800X - Apps & Gaming (RTX 4090)
- RX 7900 XT vs RTX 4080 - Gaming 1080p 1440p 4K RT (i7 12700KF)
- RTX 3070 vs RX 7900 XT - Gaming 1080p 1440p 4K RT (i9 13900K)