RTX 4080 vs RTX 3090 TI - Apps & Gaming (Core i9 13900K)
Topic: nVidia GeForce RTX 4080 vs nVidia GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
» View on YouTube| SPECIFICATION | Diff. L/R | Diff. R/L | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPU | nVidia GeForce RTX 4080 | nVidia GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | ||
| CPU | Core i9 13900K | Core i9 13900K | ||
| Motherboard | ASUS ROG Maximus Z790 | ASUS ROG Maximus Z790 | ||
| RAM | 2x16GB DDR5-6800 | 2x16GB DDR5-6800 | ||
| Operating System | Windows 11 21H2 | Windows 11 21H2 | ||
| APPLICATION BENCHMARK | ||||
| Blender 3.4.0 Barber Shop (Render Time in Seconds – Lower is Better) | 68 | 91 | 33.8 % | 25.3 % |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0 Classroom (Samples per minute – Higher is Better) | 2404 | 1673 | 43.7 % | 30.4 % |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0 Junk Shop (Samples per minute – Higher is Better) | 2292 | 1905 | 20.3 % | 16.9 % |
| Blender Benchmark 3.4.0 Monster (Samples per minute – Higher is Better) | 4841 | 2964 | 63.3 % | 38.8 % |
| UL Procyon – Photo Editing Adobe Photoshop (Score – Higher is Better) | 11025 | 11933 | 7.6 % | 8.2 % |
| UL Procyon – Video Editing Adobe Premiere (Score – Higher is Better) | 10092 | 9790 | 3.1 % | 3.0 % |
| DaVinci Resolve H264 Timeline Export (Render Time in Seconds – Lower is Better) | 296 | 281 | 5.1 % | 5.3 % |
| SPECviewperf 2020 – Energy (Score – Higher is Better) | 46 | 32 | 43.8 % | 30.4 % |
| SPECviewperf 2020 – Creo (Score – Higher is Better) | 138 | 121 | 14.0 % | 12.3 % |
| SPECviewperf 2020 – 3DS Max (Score – Higher is Better) | 178 | 155 | 14.8 % | 12.9 % |
| SPECviewperf 2020 – Solidworks (Score – Higher is Better) | 239 | 213 | 12.2 % | 10.9 % |
| SPECviewperf 2020 – Medical (Score – Higher is Better) | 31 | 25 | 24.0 % | 19.4 % |
| SPECviewperf 2020 – CATIA (Score – Higher is Better) | 77 | 67 | 14.9 % | 13.0 % |
| SPECviewperf 2020 – Siemens NX (Score – Higher is Better) | 35 | 28 | 25.0 % | 20.0 % |
| SPECviewperf 2020 – Maya (Score – Higher is Better) | 452 | 378 | 19.6 % | 16.4 % |
| SPECworkstation 3.1 – Life Sciences (Score – Higher is Better) | 10 | 8 | 25.0 % | 20.0 % |
| SPECworkstation 3.1 – Product Dev (Score – Higher is Better) | 3 | 2 | 50.0 % | 33.3 % |
| SPECworkstation 3.1 – Media & Ent. (Score – Higher is Better) | 9 | 7 | 28.6 % | 22.2 % |
| SPECworkstation 3.1 – Energy (Score – Higher is Better) | 18 | 10 | 80.0 % | 44.4 % |
| SPECworkstation 3.1 – GPU Compute (Score – Higher is Better) | 8 | 6 | 33.3 % | 25.0 % |
| GAMING BENCHMARK | ||||
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4K, Highest Preset, RT OFF, Scaling OFF (Average FPS – Higher is Better) | 135 | 113 | 19.5 % | 16.3 % |
| F1 22 4K, Ultra High Preset, Canada(Wet), RT OFF, Scaling OFF (Average FPS – Higher is Better) | 165 | 148 | 11.5 % | 10.3 % |
| Hitman 3 4K, Ultra Setting – Dubai, Scaling OFF (Average FPS – Higher is Better) | 159 | 135 | 17.8 % | 15.1 % |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 4K, Ultra Preset, Scaling OFF (Average FPS – Higher is Better) | 99 | 89 | 11.2 % | 10.1 % |
| Assassin’s Creed: Valhalla 4K, Ultra Preset, Scaling OFF (Average FPS – Higher is Better) | 100 | 83 | 20.5 % | 17.0 % |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 4K, Ultra Preset, Scaling OFF (Average FPS – Higher is Better) | 95 | 79 | 20.3 % | 16.8 % |
| Cyberpunk 2077 4K, Ultra Preset, RT OFF, Scaling OFF (Average FPS – Higher is Better) | 65 | 63 | 3.2 % | 3.1 % |
| Forza Horizon 5 4K, Ultra Preset, RT OFF, Scaling OFF (Average FPS – Higher is Better) | 123 | 97 | 26.8 % | 21.1 % |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p, Highest Preset, RT OFF, Scaling OFF (Average FPS – Higher is Better) | 249 | 196 | 27.0 % | 21.3 % |
| Hitman 3 1440p, Highest Preset – Dubai, Scaling OFF (Average FPS – Higher is Better) | 292 | 237 | 23.2 % | 18.8 % |
| Cyberpunk 2077 1440p, Ultra Preset, RT OFF, Scaling OFF (Average FPS – Higher is Better) | 133 | 115 | 15.7 % | 13.5 % |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 1440p, Ultra Preset, Scaling OFF (Average FPS – Higher is Better) | 154 | 127 | 21.3 % | 17.5 % |
| Assassin’s Creed: Valhalla 1440p, Ultra Preset, Scaling OFF (Average FPS – Higher is Better) | 151 | 125 | 20.8 % | 17.2 % |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 1440p, Ultra Preset, Scaling OFF (Average FPS – Higher is Better) | 153 | 127 | 20.5 % | 17.0 % |
| Forza Horizon 5 1440p, Ultra Preset, RT OFF, Scaling OFF (Average FPS – Higher is Better) | 164 | 132 | 24.2 % | 19.5 % |
| Average FPS (Higher is Better) | 149.13 | 124.4 | 19.9 % | 16.6 % |
» View on YouTube
Topic: nVidia GeForce RTX 4080 vs nVidia GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
Other benchmark and comparison:
- GTX 1650 vs RX 5600 XT - 1080p Gaming Benchmark
- RYZEN 7 7700X vs RYZEN 9 7950X3D - Productivity & Gaming (RTX 4090)
- QUADRO P2000 vs QUADRO P4000 - Workstation / Content Creation Benchmark
- RYZEN 5 5600X vs CORE I5 10600K - Apps & Gaming Benchmark (RTX 3090)
- CORE I7 10700K vs RYZEN 7 5800X - Apps & Gaming (RTX 4090)
- CORE I3 10100 vs CORE I9 9900K - Application Benchmark
- RYZEN 5 3600 vs RYZEN 9 5950X - Productivity & Gaming (RTX 3080)
- RX 6700 XT vs RTX 4060 TI 8GB - Gaming 1080p 1440p 4K RT (i7 12700KF)
- VII vs RTX 2070 - Gaming 1080P 1440P (Ryzen 9 3950X)
- RX 6800 XT vs RX 6700 XT - Gaming 1080P 1440P (Ryzen 9 3950X)